Dan’s Writing Blog

About Speaking And Writing

Numerous lecturers on subjects concerning writing counsel that a student must write as he speaks. In other words, the expressions he writes ought to be the way he speaks them. It is as if there is no essential disparity between writing and speaking, or else such a difference is deemed too small to make any dissimilarity. Perhaps there is some certainty in that, that the statements you speak can be used in everything you write. Excepting, of course, specific topics with their own idioms, such as law and electronics, where plenty of expressions of the topics are not used in ordinary conversation, although the expressions are effortlessly comprehended when people learned in those topics discuss them with each other.

Yet, past the two-way awareness of specific words in the range of same-orientation talk, there is a fundamental differencebetween speaking and writing, and it is contained in the central difference between the spoken word and written one magnified by the person’s understanding and abilities: the verbal word is fleeting, while the written word is immobile.

Let us dissect the situation. When a word is spoken its noise –and only the sound  travel through the listener’s ear and into his brain, where it is interpreted into the idea indicated by the sound completed. In there lie the complexities, because;

1) the oral word is ephemeral

2) it can be understood only by its sound

3) it is translated founded on the lexicon ofnotions in the listener’s knowledge

4) numerous homonyms and near-homonyms exist. 

Hence, often, only if a hardly-heard word is restated, its intentional connotation becomes a assumption game for the listener. Thus a predicament develops if the word is not to be repeated

On the reverse side, the written word is there on the paper until the paper itself breaks down, so the personality can read it anew and again until he gets the import if he was not able to interpret it right the first attempt. Furthermore, inasmuch as it is printed, the word’s interpretation is virtually correct, varied solely by the framework in which it was utilized. It is thus to an extent easier to understand the written word inasmuch as its anticipated denotation is obvious right from the start. There is hardly any requirement to restate the exact sentence; conversely, its reiteration via a new style is preferable. In the same way, more exact, ancient or technical language may even be stated and nonetheless make the presentation understood, if not better.

Hence when writing down an idea, one can state it only one time and the reader can read it more than once if he should, to see the word’s meaning. But to make an vocally declared concept, one might need to repeat the word several times to be understood, moreso if the word itself has like-sounding words and near-homonyms.  It is why public speakers speak in easy to understand language and repetitions to be understood totally or at least adequately by their audiences.

Naturally one can write as he speaks, but he can also consider the words of Confucius, “What you think you said may not be what I think I heard.” To read about something totally different visit this link warcraft gold and learn about buying world of warcraft gold for you character and take your game to the next level.